2 Anglers missing from on the water coverage?

  • fluker
    Posts: 242
    February 24, 2006 at 4:54 pm #1215829

    Noticed only 49 anglers in the listing for on the water coverage (http://espn.winnercomm.com/). Any idea why they are missing.

    One of which is Scott Rook. I MEANT TO and THOUGHT I swapped Rook for Wirth in my FF league at last minute. However I just noticed my dumb arse accidentally changed WALKER for Wirth instead of Rook. Too late to correct my mistake now. DOH!!!!!

    fluker
    Posts: 242
    February 24, 2006 at 6:07 pm #424116

    Rook’s there now. Man did I FUBAR myself in FF by that screw up. If I had Walker instead of Rook I’d be sitting pretty.

    ratlnrap
    Rochester, MN
    Posts: 24
    February 24, 2006 at 7:24 pm #424141

    Hey Chuck…who else do you have? Did you take Champman? I added him at the last minute and it looks like he’s gettin’ ’em…hope they’re toads! Bad deal on Rook!

    fluker
    Posts: 242
    February 24, 2006 at 9:14 pm #424193

    Looks like I was OK on Walker. Only 9 LBs. But Rook could have blanked??

    You can see from the weigh in that the On the Water stuff was WAY off. Cochran listed as 0 fish and he had 15 lbs.

    I didn’t have Jimmy. But still rooting for him to win!!!

    I have Rook, Martens, Wirth, Coble and Clark.

    fluker
    Posts: 242
    February 24, 2006 at 9:49 pm #424210

    Seems bad luck = good fortune for me!

    timdomaille
    Rochester Mn
    Posts: 1908
    February 24, 2006 at 9:53 pm #424213

    Rook is 4th right now with 17 lbs.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.