BigWerm wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>waldo9190 wrote:</div>
A lot of the extended round mocks that I’ve seen that do have us trading back have us doing it and only picking up a later 3rd or early 4th round pick, which I would absolutely not do. Unless we’re picking up an additional EARLY 3rd or even a second, and staying in the 1st round,

Just say you don’t want them to trade the pick then. I don’t know if anyone has ever traded back from 24 while staying in the 1st round and picking up a second or EARLY third. That’s a lot to pay to move up 8 spots or less.

That is essentially what I said, glad you picked up on that ha. Maybe its just PTSD from the Spielman years and that first Kwesi draft, but I just don’t believe ONE additional 4th rounder is worth moving back 8+ spots.

A lot of the extended round mocks that I’ve seen that do have us trading back have us doing it and only picking up a later 3rd or early 4th round pick, which I would absolutely not do. Unless we’re picking up an additional EARLY 3rd or even a second, and staying in the 1st round, I’m against trading back. There will still be a ton of great talent at OL/DL/DB at 24 that we should just take our guy and move forward. All the teams that are currently ar 25-32 need OL/DL so a ton of that available talent could be gone if we trade back too far.

For me its Grey Zabel (G), Kenneth Grant (DT), Jahdae Barron (S), Maxwell Hairston (CB), or Derrick Harmon (DT), barring a crazy slide for a higher ranked player. I’m not too terribly high on Emmanwori, but if we take him I trust the staff won’t let Cine 2.0 happen. End of the day we need to sit tight and take BPA.

For anyone who hasn’t done it, it is an ABSOLUTE blast. Ive been privileged enough to do it a few times locally as well as down in Louisiana in the Mississippi River delta. There is nothing like shooting 5+ foot gar or 30 lb cats from a boat with a bow.

Just like anything, there are a few bad apples who ruin the reputation of the group, but as long as people are only using their “upright” lights for navigation and keep the commotion respectful the have at it.

Augh man, that is a shame. Prime Val Kilmer was as good as anyone IMO, and honestly Top Gun and Tombstone are two of my favorites.

fins wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>jimmysiewert wrote:</div>
Let’s just have a free for all then Fins on public land and water. Sounds like that is what you want correct?

That’s why it’s called public land.

So does that mean in any public road I can wind the ole Silverado up to 120 wherever I see fit? I mean, its public right? And I pay taxes on my vehicle/registration to be able to do that, right?

No, there are rules. I completely understand the aversion to TOO MANY rules as can be so common in this state, especially with natural resources. But “public land” doesn’t mean free for all motocross wherever any hooligan sees fit.

That’s about the limit I’d spend on an Elk tag, but I just have such a hard time spending over $700+ on a deer tag. I love mule deer as much as the next guy but man is that a tough pill to swallow.

I’d rather burn (much less) money on a cow elk tag.

CaptainMusky wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>waldo9190 wrote:</div>
Oh I definitely looked at his stats and saw a QB who was worse in almost every category than Darnold, who I am/was also 100% ok with moving on from. He’s also 41, has had a recent Achilles tear. ALSO, we all saw plenty of Kirk putting up “stats” to know that stats aren’t everything.

Now compare Rodgers to Mahomes. You don’t think Rodgers putting up stats with that crap team even after adding Adams is significant?

Lol if we’re going to use that as a metric on a down year for Mahomes we should have extended Darnold.

But we didn’t, because the FO has a plan that revolves around JJ being successful.

CaptainMusky wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>waldo9190 wrote:</div>
The issue is have with the potential to bring in Rodgers is that there is absolutely no guarantee that we see an Arog any better than he was on the jets last year.

Did you actually look at his stats or just the Jets win/loss record for posting this? Just curious.

Oh I definitely looked at his stats and saw a QB who was worse in almost every category than Darnold, who I am/was also 100% ok with moving on from. He’s also 41, has had a recent Achilles tear. ALSO, we all saw plenty of Kirk putting up “stats” to know that stats aren’t everything.

The issue is have with the potential to bring in Rodgers is that there is absolutely no guarantee that we see an Arog any better than he was on the jets last year. The guys is 41, and IMO the damage potential moving forward is way greater than the potential upside. If this was 36 year old Arog and/or he played significantly better last season I’d be all on board. Way too many people are holding onto the “what if we get great Rodgers” sentiment, maybe because we all loved through his prime and saw what he was able to do for so many years.

We bought a Sebo E3 canister vacuum last year that that thing absolutely rocks. I balked at the price at first but it came with a 10 year warranty with complimentary yearly service. I can 100% tell a difference with vacuuming our home with the Sebo vs your run of the mill stick vacuums. Manufactured in Germany and most people get 20+ years out of their Sebos if taken care of.

I have a few of the Sofirn handheld lights and two of the H25LR headlamps that are USBC rechargeable. Super bright, have the red LED for hunting, and they’re PLENTY bright enough to see planar boards at night that are wwwaaayyyy out there.

One thing you can do is cut a square of reflectix insulation to fit between the poles and roof. That stuff insulates super well and when I had an old uninsulated flip over it worked great to keep heat in.

For the record, it won’t be going to the “other” 50% of non resident tags to a true random draw like NM, but will be more of a bonus point system vs the preference points. Technically someone with little or no points will have a chance, but the odds will still be slim vs if you have a few points.

B-man wrote:

Rubber flooring works but it isn’t the easiest to keep clean (stuff likes to stick to it), and it doesn’t look all that great.

I’d 100% go with a waterproof LVT click flooring. It cleans up easily and looks SO much better.

Had it in the shack we sold and would never go with anything else. When the inside is really cold (single digits or colder) it can be a little slippery depending on your boots, but definitely isn’t a deal breaker.

If it’s any concern you could add a carpet or rubber runner down the middle of the shack.

B-Man, did you ever have any issues with the planks buckling or anything during the summer? Also, were the cabinets, dinette, etc framed right over the top of the planks, or were the planks laid only within the “living area”?

I’m leaning towards either vinyl sheet or vinyl plank and don’t mind having a couple carpet runners for high traffic areas.

7mm-08 is great, and if you reload it can be even better. Lots of guys loading up projectiles like the 162 ELDm with great BC and terminal performance, but even the 150 ELDx factory loads would be great. Ballistics are close enough to a 27o that I don’t personally believe the recoil penalty is worth it, but YMMV.

That said, I currently shoot a 6.5 creed and a 308, with a 270 Tikka barrel in the bullpen if I ever feel nostalgic.

The other option I’m considering is one of the roll-on garage floor epoxy coatings, which would probably be the easiest and most durable once I get the carpet up.

Bearcat89 wrote:

Definitely go rubber.
But why are you getting a 24, seems way to new for that

Edited to fix the year, the house is a 2014.

Honestly i could probably get away with 5 spoons that I use for 95% of my walleye fishing, but more spoons is more fun.

Sig makes a really nice 1911 from my experiences.

Yeah for that price BC you can’t afford NOT to buy it. I would have done the same!

I do know that after shooting multiple sights with vertical pins, I prefer horizontal pins. I’ll probably end up going with the whichever I get a better deal on between the Tetra x3 or the Boonie.

Bearcat89 wrote:

I ended up ordering a hha tetra ryz x3 dovetail this morning for a 100 off and free shipping. So I’m pretty excited to get that on my lift.

I’ve got the 2-pin Ryz right now that I really really like, but am considering going to the three pin next year. Three pin sliders are about the best setup out west IMO, and work just as well around here. The other sight I’ve got my eye on is that new Spot Hogg Boonie in a 3 pin.

I have no problem with some of the higher end Vortex stuff, but the fact that there are so many “hey their customer service and warranty is great!” comments everywhere isn’t exactly a good thing.

From what I understand the primary issue with the new turbo V6’s was that a lot of them had machining debris left in the block that didn’t get cleaned during assembly, and has led to a significant number of those engines grenading themselves in as little as 10k miles. Lots of information online about it, but it sounds like this is mostly isolated from mid ’22 when they started the new body/engines to December builds of ’23. They’re on my short list for my next upgrade, as I don’t see myself needing anything larger than a half-ton any time soon. I’d also not be sad about snagging a mint ’20-’22 second gen that still had the 5.7. Love the looks of those trucks and that motor is dead reliable.

Like anything, there are going to be some growing pains with all the companies implementing turbo V6’s due to emissions regulations, but they will figure it out. If you travel outside the US much you’ll notice that most SUVs in foreign markets are powered by some form of small turbo-diesel or turbo 4/6 cylinder gas motor.

Shot my buck this year with a 130 TMK (tipped match king) handload out of the 6.5 creed and it absolutely hammered him. Top of heart gone, lungs shredded, and a nice 50 cent sized exit. Perfect performance.

There is a 65 or so page thread on the Rokslide forum of guys tipping game over at ranges longer than pretty much all of us shoot (elk and the like up to and including 600+ yards) with match bullets out of 6.5s, 6s, and even hotrod 22 cartridges like the 22 creedmoor.

The primary thing to consider with match bullets is that YMMV heavily depending on the specific projectile. There are tons of success stories with projectiles like the 130 TMK, 130/140/147 eldm, or most of the Berger offerings. HOWEVER, I would absolutely NOT shoot game with something like a 142 SMK.

End of the day, do your research and put it in the boiler room. We’re blessed to be living in an age with tons of great bullets for pretty much all of the popular cartridges.

Attachments:

1. 

   20241109_093200-scaled.jpg
   

I’ve been vehemently against Hoyts for quite a while but depending on how it shoots a grey RX9 might follow me home this coming year. I LOVE my Lift 29, but at least on paper that RX9 checks a lot of my boxes (other than MSRP ).

Brittman wrote:

In a deer stand in the heart of wolf country which is no longer that far north. Unit 156. See wolves as often as deer on the trail cam. 3 shots this morning heard – total. Not so long ago I would not have need tried to count shots or have my cell phone in my hand at this time of the morning.

There are three different bucks on recent cam pics so there is a ray of hope.

Perfect morning…. Calm, clear, 28F. Grouse and squirrels are my companions.

Britt what area of 156 are you in? We’re uo by Mahtowa and I had a pack howling a couple parcels north of me on the north side of our farm. Fortunately was able to bag a 7 pointer this morning, but the wolf sign is heavy on our farm. Has been for 6-7 years now unfortunately.

Are you sure it broke due to the rib on the ENTRY side and wasn’t because of being stuck in the far side on a running deer?

Arrows/bolts shot into game SHOULD be considered a consumable, with one being able to be reused just being a bonus.

156 here.

Meh, to me these arguments against things like a youth waterfowl or deer season always come across as “that’s not how I did it so you can do it either.” I know for a fact that there were old timers back in the day arguing that scopes shouldn’t be allowed “because that’s not sportsman like and makes for a worse hunter.” But many of us would obviously still choose to use scopes on rifles.

I know when my girls are old enough you can bet your britches I’ll be taking them out during the early season, with the odds of success and better weather being in our favor.