Quote:
It is completely do-able if you’re willing to tolerate signal to display lag times. Will we see it in the future? Likely. But right now the brightest minds in sonar aren’t finding obvious solutions for overcoming the hurdles and ice anglers aren’t likely to be willing to fish with anything that would show significant/noticeable delays.
I’m sure they’ll keep working on it though.
I agree the current application isn’t quite there, but what I would love would be to separate the hardware and the software. I would love to use the new high resolution displays that are MUCH cheaper than what we find in our fish finders (likely due to economies of scale) and use the marcum/HB/Lowrance software. Plugs and cords are OK, but let me use my off the shelf tablet, and a standard transducer.
I get that the units of today are water proof and more durable, but there isn’t a good technical reason not to do this. I am sure a profitable business model would emerge. But probably not with the margins todays fishing electronics makers enjoy.