I have the same feelings as you do early season, but alot of what I’ve seen the past few seasons has me changing my thought process a bit. We used to pass on all those does, at all times of the year, and have made hunting very difficult on our property!
What I’ve observed on our own land is a handful of does will bear a majority of the fawns in our area (mostly twins here). These mother does (discernible on-camera and while hunting through identifiable characteristics on their bodies) offer a few advantages.
-They bed in reliable locations throughout the year with their young.
-They repeat these patterns fairly closely each year.
The major disadvantage for us, is that these old does will pick off your stand locations and avoid them, educating other deer (and any bucks that may be following) in the process. Unless you move your stands yearly, (almost all of them more than just one tree over), they hear you climb down, see you coming or going, wind you, or see you up in the stand, and will avoid you.
By taking only yearlings, or 1-3 year old (dumber does), you’re promoting older, wiser animals that are much harder to hunt, and that make other deer smarter in the process. It’s why I took that old doe with my bow a few days ago. She winded me, and picked me off while motionless, even though I had good screening cover. She’s simply played the game many, many times before.
If whitetail populations were in trouble where I hunt, this would obviously be a poor strategy, as the better they are at avoiding hunters, the better the species does. However, in most areas of the upper midwest, I feel that promoting a younger median-aged doe population is a good thing for your hunting.
Ideas? Thoughts?
Joel