Where’d that thread go:

  • cade-laufenberg
    Participant
    Winona,MN/La Crosse, WI
    Posts: 3667
    July 21, 2007 at 12:45 am #592516

    sorry guys, just not digging those girls.

    hunting4walleyes has good taste, jmo!

    stuart
    Participant
    Mn.
    Posts: 3682
    July 21, 2007 at 12:09 pm #592563

    Quote:

    sorry guys, just not digging those girls.

    hunting4walleyes has good taste, jmo!

    Cade.ya dont want pics of dudes holding fish do you?

    Shane Hildebrandt
    Participant
    Blaine, mn
    Posts: 2921
    July 21, 2007 at 4:03 pm #592577

    gee thanks guys, I just got banned off of IDA due to the graphic content of the women pictures. here i had my wife thinking it was a hunting and fishing website, not a girlie hunting and fishing website. next time, i will have to be sure she isn’t around to see me look at this post.

    assfault
    Participant
    Posts: 14
    July 21, 2007 at 6:50 pm #592594

    I like where this is heading.

    cade-laufenberg
    Participant
    Winona,MN/La Crosse, WI
    Posts: 3667
    July 21, 2007 at 7:21 pm #592598

    Quote:

    Quote:

    sorry guys, just not digging those girls.

    hunting4walleyes has good taste, jmo!

    Cade.ya dont want pics of dudes holding fish do you?

    nah I’m alright. I’d actually rather fish (verb) with hot girls than get all pumped up looking at pictures of gross skanks on the internet!

    Mudshark
    Participant
    LaCrosse WI
    Posts: 2973
    July 21, 2007 at 8:30 pm #592611

    Quote:

    nah I’m alright. I’d actually rather fish (verb) with hot girls than get all pumped up looking at pictures of gross skanks on the internet!


    Gross skanks???? Ok Cade…whatever you say…..I agree with the “just pictures” thing but your standards must be real high….but that’s ok too…
    Everyone should aim as high as possible.

Viewing 6 posts - 61 through 66 (of 66 total)
1 2 3

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.